TL;DR

The US has designated Mexican cartels as terrorist organisations, fundamentally changing how money moves and how anyone doing business in Mexico gets scrutinised. Mexican football has documented intersections with organised crime allegations, from sanctioned players to club leadership investigations. Now add World Cup 2026, happening whilst the US reasserts dominance in the Americas (think: Monroe Doctrine 2.0) and Mexico pushes back on sovereignty grounds. The result? Mexican football is high-upside but now high-risk. If you're a club, investor, or brand engaging with Mexico, your governance frameworks need to be bulletproof: full beneficial ownership transparency, strict third party controls, due diligence, and contract termination rights for sanctions risk. The scrutiny is elevated, and weak governance could land you in regulatory hot water. For governance professionals this is about thinking about the systems in action, where geopolitics, financial crime risk, and commercial strategy come together.

Field Vision X Goal Assist Partnership

Whether you’re building a career, growing a business, or offering a service to clubs, your income is tied to your access, relationships and Visibility.

Hello, Hi Visionaries!

Right, let's talk about something a bit different this week. Something that sits at the chaotic intersection of geopolitics, organised crime designations, and the beautiful game. Because if you think World Cup 2026 is just about Ronaldo’s last chance to get the games top prize and who's getting the broadcasting rights, you're missing the bigger board move happening in the background.

The Set-Up: Cartels as Terrorists Changes Everything

Since early 2025, the United States has been designating certain Mexican cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organisations (FTOs) and Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGTs), essentially putting them in the same enforcement category as groups like ISIS. This isn't symbolic. It's a shift in how money moves, how banks behave, and how anyone touching Mexican business gets scrutinised.

OFAC (the US Treasury's sanctions enforcer) doesn't mess about. When they designate someone, global financial systems start moving differently. Banks delay transfers. Compliance teams sweat. Brands insert termination clauses into contracts. And sectors known for cash density (hospitality, construction, gambling, and yes, football) suddenly become board-level risk topics.

Historical precedent? Think about FIFA's own corruption scandals that led to the 2015 arrests. The US didn't prosecute those cases because they love football governance. They did it because financial flows through the US system gave them jurisdiction. Cartels getting the terror label? Same playbook, different target. Enforcement follows the money, and football has always been excellent at moving money around.

Mexico's Football and Organised Crime: It's Not Paranoia If It's Happened Before

Let's be clear: Mexican football isn't "run by cartels." But it has repeatedly intersected with organised crime allegations in ways that should make anyone writing a cheque or signing a partnership very, very careful.

A few receipts:

2017: Rafael Márquez, Mexico national team captain, was sanctioned by the US Treasury over alleged links to a suspected trafficking network. He denied wrongdoing, but his name was on an OFAC list.

2020: Cruz Azul's leadership faced allegations of fraud and organised crime links, according to documents reported by ESPN.

US prosecutions have alleged the use of Mexican football teams as covers for laundering operations.

And right now, the US is actively targeting cartel-linked fuel theft logistics and casino laundering networks tied to major cartels like CJNG and Sinaloa.

Mexico is a high-upside market (passionate fans, commercial growth, diaspora engagement) but governance has to assume organised crime adjacency risk exists somewhere in the ecosystem. Maybe it's in ticketing. Maybe it's in construction vendors. Maybe it's in the "consultant" who knows a guy who knows a guy.

World Cup 2026: The Geopolitical Pressure Cooker

Now add the World Cup into this mix. Mexico isn't just hosting matches. It's co-hosting a global mega-event during a period when the US is reasserting what some analysts are calling "Monroe Doctrine 2.0."

In early January 2026, the US conducted a military operation in Venezuela resulting in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, a move framed as part of a broader hemispheric strategy focused on resource control, access, and limiting rival influence (particularly China and Russia). This isn't your grandfather's Monroe Doctrine about keeping European powers out. This is about asserting dominance over energy flows, trade corridors, and political outcomes across Latin America.

Mexico's response? President Claudia Sheinbaum rejected US military intervention and reaffirmed Mexico's constitutional principles of sovereignty and non-intervention. That's a polite diplomatic "stay in your lane," delivered on the global stage.

So here's the tension: the US is pushing a sphere-of-influence agenda whilst co-hosting a World Cup with a country that just publicly pushed back on that very agenda. And all of this is happening under the world's media spotlight, with billions watching.

Historical precedent? Look at the 1978 World Cup in Argentina, held during a brutal military dictatorship. FIFA didn't pull the tournament, but the geopolitical backdrop shadowed every match. Or the 2018 World Cup in Russia, held amid sanctions and geopolitical isolation. Sport doesn't happen in a vacuum. It amplifies the political context it sits within.

What This Means for Governance (and Why You Should Care)

If you're a European club eyeing Mexican talent, a PE fund looking at Liga MX investment, or a brand considering a commercial partnership, here's the governance:

1. Payments and Banking Will Get Harder

When cartels are designated as terrorists, banks tighten controls. Expect slower cross-border payments, more requests for information (RFIs), and sudden account freezes if a counterparty looks "adjacent" to a risk corridor.

2. Contracts Need Teeth

Sponsors and broadcasters are inserting stronger termination rights and enhanced representations around beneficial ownership transparency, third-party payer identification, and "no dealings with sanctioned persons" clauses.

If you're signing deals in Mexico, these aren't nice-to-haves. They're essentials.

3. Vendor Risk Is Now a Board Issue

Security contractors, stadium operators, catering, construction. These are classic financial crime points in high-risk environments. Under heightened US scrutiny, these become board-level liabilities, not operational level paperwork.

4. The Talent Pipeline Needs Governance Guardrails

If you're building a Mexico-to-Europe talent strategy, you need written transfer governance (approvals, fee breakdowns, intermediary caps), a strict no third-party payer policy, centralised documentation (no side letters floating around).

Why? Because one bad intermediary or one murky payment structure could land your club in a regulatory investigation that makes the back pages for all the wrong reasons.

The Play: What to Demand Before You Touch Mexican Football

Here's the short version of what governance should look like if you're engaging with Mexican football in any serious capacity:

A) Ownership & Control

Full beneficial ownership map (including trusts, nominees, side vehicles). PEP/sanctions/adverse media screening for owners, directors, executives, and "shadow controllers."

B) Source of Funds/Wealth

Proof of origin for equity injections, shareholder loans, sponsorship advances. Red flags: cash-intensive businesses (casinos, fuel logistics, construction) that have appeared in cartel laundering narratives.

C) Third Parties Are the Real Risk

Right-to-audit clauses, termination rights for sanctions risk, subcontractor transparency. This covers security vendors, ticketing partners, hospitality, construction, and local "fixers."

D) Supporter Groups and Local Power

Policy on supporter engagement, controls around free tickets, travel, "donations," and informal cash flows. Safeguarding and security escalation routes.

E) Integrity & Match Risk

Data integrity controls, betting-related exposure policies, internal reporting lines independent from commercial leadership.

The Big Idea

When cartels are treated as terrorist entities, football stops being a local cultural product and becomes part of a cross-border enforcement ecosystem. Mexico's commercial upside rises (passionate fans, growing media rights, diaspora engagement) but so does the cost of weak governance.

And with World Cup 2026 happening in the middle of a renewed US foreign policy strategy? The scrutiny is heightened.

The takeaway for business professionals: Mexico is investable, but only if you treat it as a high-potential, high-control environment. That means asking harder questions, demanding more transparency, and building governance frameworks that can withstand regulatory heat.

Because the last thing you want is your name showing up in an OFAC alert or a compliance newsletter because you didn't ask the right questions about who actually owns that ticketing platform or who's financing that stadium build.

Sicario level governance

Final Thought

Sport has always been a stage where politics, money, and power collide. The 2026 World Cup will be no different, except this time, the collision is happening with cartel designations, Monroe Doctrine assertions, and a co-host relationship that's diplomatically... "complex."

For those of us in governance, this is both a warning and an opportunity. The clubs, investors, and brands that build robust frameworks now will navigate this complexity cleanly. The ones that don't? Well, they'll learn the hard way that geopolitics isn't background noise. It's the game within the game.

And if you're serious about a board role or advisory position in sports, being able to map these intersections (governance, financial crime risk, geopolitical context, and commercial strategy) is exactly the kind thinking that gets you in the room.

News this week

Sports & PE Investment: New Capital In Sports Infrastructure

Bruin Capital (sports investment firm) raises $1 billion led by Apollo co-founder

  • Bruin Capital, backed by Apollo Global Management co-founder Josh Harris and private equity TJC, has completed a $1 billion fundraising round for sport-focused investments.

  • The vehicle will target sports ecosystem companies such as data providers, streaming tech, and sports-betting service platforms rather than directly buying teams.

Why it matters: This is a macro-level institutional investment trend linking private equity and institutional capital to the broader sports business ecosystem, not just club ownership.

Sheffield Wednesday takeover process advancing

  • A consortium led by former poker player and tech entrepreneur James Bord has emerged as the preferred bidder to acquire financially troubled Sheffield Wednesday. EFL approval is pending and questions remain about the investors’ experience.

Controversy & commercial governance concerns

  • Local coverage raising eyebrows about the new potential ownership team’s football credentials including past decision-making and AI-driven transfer strategies which underscores governance and capability risks tied to non-traditional investors.

Wrexham’s private equity partnership continues to resonate

  • Although the Apollo Sports Capital minority investment in Wrexham AFC was formally announced before the last 2 weeks, its strategic implications continue to ripple through coverage — illustrating how PE is being used to fund club infrastructure and long-term growth plans.

This newsletter is for informational purposes only and is not financial or business advice in any capacity. The information shared is our thoughts & opinions and does not represent the opinions of any other person, business, entity, or sponsor. The contents of this newsletter also should not be used in any public or private domain without the authors express permission.

1 

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading

No posts found